
[2] Calculation of Higher Ampacities for 02000 Volt Cables [3] Does the NEC Code Allow Alternate Ampacity Calculations? [4] Determining the Effects of Application Factors Not Accounted For in the Code [5] Organization and Reporting of Circuit Ampacities [6] Calculated Ampacities and Local Governing Authorities Aerial Ampacity Calculations and the NEC Code
Calculation of Higher Ampacities for 02000 Volt Cables Using the industry accepted NeherMcGrath calculation procedures, higher ampacities can be determined than provided in the Code for 02000 Volt cables. The calculations procedures used to produce the 02000 Volt NEC Code ampacity tables were developed in the 1930s and documented in a 1938 AIEE paper by S. J. Rosch^{1}. In its time, this work was excellent and greatly advanced the state of the art of ampacity calculation procedures. However, the subsequent NeherMcGrath^{2} calculations further advanced the state of the art and form the basis of all subsequent cable ampacity standards, including IEEE Standard S135, (IPCEA P46426), and IEEE Standard 8351994. The NEC Code itself contains a number of ampacity tables which are based on the NeherMcGrath calculations as implemented in the S135 standard. A summary of the NEC tables shows that all ampacities for cables greater than 2000 Volts are derived directly from Standard S135, which in turn was based on the NeherMcGrath calculation procedures. This results in some internal inconsistencies in the NEC Code between 0 – 2000 Volt cable ampacities, (referred herein as low voltage), and 2001 – 35,000 Volt ampacities, (referred herein as high voltage.) The net result as demonstrated below, is that the Code specifies significantly higher ampacities for high voltage cable applications than for low voltage applications. Refer to Tables 1 which compare various ratings for three 500 kcmil cables in conduit in air. Note that for various cable voltages from 2001 through 35,000 Volts for the NEC Code, and from 1 to 15 kV for Standard S135, all ampacities for this installation stay in a relatively tight band of values from a minimum of 473 amps to a maximum of 481 amps. In contrast, the NEC Table 310.16 rating, at 430 amps, is significantly lower. Table 1 Comparative Ampacities for Three 500 kcmil Single Conductor Cables in Conduit in Air Copper Conductors at 90 Deg C in 40 Deg C Ambient
However, even this is not an equivalent comparison since the Table 310.16 values are based on a 30 Degree C ambient air temperature, whereas the other ratings are at a 40 Degree C ambient. Converting to a 30 Degree C ambient yields a Table 310.16 ampacity of only 391 amps, which is 82% of the S135 value for 1 kV class cable. Table 2 Comparative Ampacities for One Single Conductor 500 kcmil Cable Isolated in Air Copper Conductor at 90 Deg C in 40 Deg C Ambient
In like manner, Table 2 summaries the various ratings for a single conductor 500 kcmil cable isolated in air. Again, all ampacity ratings are in a relatively tight band from 678 to 695 amps, except for the NEC Table 310.17 value which at 637 amps, is 92% of the equivalent S135 rating. ^{ 1 "The CurrentCarrying Capacity of RubberInsulated Conductors", S. J. Rosch, AIEE Transactions, Vol. 57, April 1938, p. 155167. 2 "The Calculation of the Temperature Rise and Load Capability of Cable Systems", J. H. Neher, M. H. McGrath, AIEE Transactions, October 1957, p. 752 – 771. } 
Copyright 2015, CalcWare, Katy, Texas 